Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - €88.28 vs €301.44
- Up to 58% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 7 7700X - €0.13 vs €0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 43% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 976 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
681
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7100 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
976
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
42%
Price, €
€301.44
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €301.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7101 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |