Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - €28.50 vs €431.06
- Up to 84% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-14700KF - €0.43 vs €2.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 142% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €28.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.69/FPS
16%
Price, €
€431.06
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €431.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |