Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4217 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 17 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 847 - 167 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 32 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7571 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |