Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3791 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 847 - 166 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 24 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€434.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €434.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |