Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 958 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 1600X - 62 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
54
87.09677419354838%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
68.64303178484109%
Multi-Core
4766
34.023415191319245%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |