Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1546 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G3900 - 498 vs 455 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
35.51344743276283%
Multi-Core
992
7.081667618503712%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
