Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2548 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1610 - 180 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.03911980440098%
Multi-Core
739
5.275556824671616%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
