Buy on Amazon
€92.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1188 days newer than Core i5-6500.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 0% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i5-6500 - 299 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Intel Processore Core i5-6500, 3.2 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.6 GHz), 4 core, 6MB Cache Socket 1151
Buy for €92.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Core i5-6500
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6500
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1177
95.30364372469636%
Multi-Core
3217
43.431888753881466%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
