Buy on Amazon
€93.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 278 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 73 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
71
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.02
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Processori (4C / 8T, 6 MB di cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost) con scheda grafica Radeon RX Vega 11
Buy for €93.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
