Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2138 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 39% better in F1 23 than FX-8350 - 209 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Colfax | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |