Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €285.0 vs €288.88
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than FX-8350 - 730 vs 674 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-8350 - €0.4 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
730
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |