Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 761 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 108 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €188.88 vs €379.64
- Up to 53% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.75 vs €3.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
95%
Value, €/FPS
€3.69/FPS
47%
Price, €
€379.64
49%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |