Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 194% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930 - 323 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €118.52 vs €719.98
- Up to 52% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.08 vs €2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
323
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
48%
Price, €
€719.98
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
34%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €118.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |