Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €19.99 vs €399.00
- Up to 94% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700K - €0.05 vs €0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930 - 486 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
377
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 799 minutes ago
Buy for €399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 799 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |