Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €19.99 vs €471.07
- Up to 94% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900K - €0.13 vs €2.16 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3930 - 218 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |