Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €19.99 vs €164.13
- Up to 85% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400 - €0.21 vs €1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930 - 121 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
93
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Buy for €164.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |