Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 114 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 453 vs 427 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 64 vs 32 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
453
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
75.60529922338968%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vermeer | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 32 |
32 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 280 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |