Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i9-10900F

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i9-10900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

3.4 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Logo
AMD Processore Ryzen 9 5950X (16 C/32 T, 72 MB di cache, boost ottima fino a 4,9 GHz)

Buy for 365.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 199 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W

Buy for 288.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 199 minutes ago

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

3.4 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Logo
AMD Processore Ryzen 9 5950X (16 C/32 T, 72 MB di cache, boost ottima fino a 4,9 GHz)

Buy for 365.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 199 minutes ago

vs

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W

Buy for 288.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 199 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

  • Performs up to 45% better in League of Legends than Core i9-10900F - 299 vs 206 FPS
  • Up to 13% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-10900F - €1.22 vs €1.4 per FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F

  • Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €288.88 vs €365.99
  • Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
This is a free version of League of Legends.
League of Legends

League of Legends

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Logo
Ryzen 9 5950X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020


FPS

299

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.22/FPS

100%

Price, €

€365.99

78%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Processore Ryzen 9 5950X (16 C/32 T, 72 MB di cache, boost ottima fino a 4,9 GHz)

Buy for 365.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 199 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

206

68%

Value, €/FPS

€1.4/FPS

87%

Price, €

€288.88

100%

Intel® Core™ i9-10900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W

Buy for 288.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 199 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Logo
Ryzen 9 5950X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Logo
Ryzen 9 5950X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020


Single-Core

2189

100%

Multi-Core

12159

100%

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1676

76%

Multi-Core

8426

69%

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

vs
Intel Core i9-10900F Logo

Intel Core i9-10900F

Nov 5th, 2020
Release DateApr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 9CollectionCore i9
VermeerCodenameComet Lake
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
16
Cores10
32
Threads20
3.4 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.8 GHz
4.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
105 WTDP
65 W
7 nm
Process Size14 nm
34.0x
Multiplier28.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.