Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900HX outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900HX is 3242 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
- Performs up to 10% better in Valheim than FX-6200 - 208 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 9 5900HX
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Cezanne | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
