Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900HX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900HX is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 436 vs 390 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 5900HX
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Cezanne | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
