Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930 - 183 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - €63.66 vs €167.92
- Up to 59% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 5700G - €0.38 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
41%
Price, €
€167.92
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €167.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Cezanne | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |