Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G3930 - 188 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - €19.99 vs €125.97
- Up to 84% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen 5 5600X - €0.11 vs €0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €125.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 319 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 319 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |