Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 585 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 103 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |