Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 516 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 259 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |