Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8300 - 116 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - €80.56 vs €131.83
- Up to 21% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 5600G - €0.9 vs €1.14 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
78%
Price, €
€131.83
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €131.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18182 minutes ago
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |