Buy on Amazon
€80.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €80.56 vs €140.4
- Up to 33% better value when playing New World than Core i5-10400 - €0.82 vs €1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 17% better in New World than FX-8300 - 115 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13833 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-10400, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 6 core fino a 4,3 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €140.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
