Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 180 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €105.57 vs €158.88
- Up to 31% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400F - €0.2 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 3400G - 555 vs 524 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
524
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€105.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €105.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18568 minutes ago
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18568 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |