Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 561 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €158.88 vs €797.69
- Up to 80% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-7820X - €0.6 vs €2.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - 267 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
20%
Price, €
€797.69
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €797.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |