Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 270 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €50.95 vs €105.57
- Up to 49% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.2 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €105.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18833 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |