Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500U is 1641 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Performs up to 7% better in Dota 2 than FX-6350 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen 5 2500U
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
