Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 165 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €111.12 vs €379.64
- Up to 70% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.1 vs €3.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 103 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
101
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €111.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.69/FPS
29%
Price, €
€379.64
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |