Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1203 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €74.94 vs €342.73
- Up to 73% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10850K - €0.38 vs €1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 25% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 244 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
195
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
27%
Price, €
€342.73
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |