Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 540 days newer than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 273 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
268
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |