Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1443 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6350 - 199 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |