Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 897 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €142.7 vs €174.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13400F - €0.59 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 254 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
243
95.66929133858267%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €142.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50611 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
85.5072463768116%
Price, €
€174
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1452
63.4061135371179%
Multi-Core
4669
43.4527687296417%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |