Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2828 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than FX-8300 - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - €80.56 vs €142.7
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €142.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74563 minutes ago
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74564 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |