Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1000 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 28% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Ryzen 3 3250U - 82 vs 64 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 12 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Picasso | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |