Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3521 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Phenom II X4 830 - 413 vs 364 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
413
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Deneb | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |