Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3129 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than FX-9590 - €73.76 vs €163.64
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €163.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76173 minutes ago
Buy for €73.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |