Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3129 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 43% better in War Thunder than FX-9590 - 192 vs 134 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |