Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 812 days newer than FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than FX-9370 - 256 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 51 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |