Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €285.0 vs €522.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-13900K - €1.34 vs €2.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Fortnite than FX-8350 - 247 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
213
86.23481781376519%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€285
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4891 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
247
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
63.20754716981132%
Price, €
€522.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4900 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |