Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than FX-4100 - 505 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
503
99.60396039603961%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |