Buy on Amazon
€23
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 238 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6350 - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
BQTEC Intel Core i3-3240 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
