Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €38.99 vs €180.79
- Up to 74% better value when playing New World than Core i5-10600K - €0.4 vs €1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 22% better in New World than FX-6300 - 120 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
26%
Price, €
€180.79
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €180.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |