Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - €24.38 vs €182.66
- Up to 68% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-7600K - €1.06 vs €3.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 139% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-4300 - 55 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
41.81818181818181%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.32/FPS
31.927710843373497%
Price, €
€182.66
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |