Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - €24.38 vs €215.06
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10500 - €0.13 vs €1.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4300 - 206 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2559 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
12%
Price, €
€215.06
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |