Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2187 days newer than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Deathloop than FX-4300 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-4300 - €21.67 vs €24.38
- Up to 40% better value when playing Deathloop than FX-4300 - €0.09 vs €0.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €21.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |