Buy on Amazon
€24.38
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €24.38 vs €152.66
- Up to 82% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-3770 - €0.04 vs €0.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than FX-4300 - 682 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
98.68035190615836%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.38
100%
Value Winner
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX-4300 FX 4300 Processore CPU Quad-Core da 3,8 GHz FD4300WMW4MHK Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
682
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
18.181818181818183%
Price, €
€152.66
15%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 - Processore
Buy for €152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
