Buy on Amazon
€22.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $494
Availability
MSRP in USD: $494
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €22.88 vs €444.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-12900F - €0.21 vs €2.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 44% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-4100 - 154 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Hegem AMD FX-Series FX4100 FX-4100 FX 4100 Processore CPU Quad-Core Quad-Thread da 3,6 GHz FD4100WMW4KGU Presa AM3+ Senza Ventola
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 399 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i9-12900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 30M, fino a 5,10 GHz
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
