Buy on Amazon
€364.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $494
Availability
MSRP in USD: $494
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-4150 - 154 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €72.58 vs €364.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel® Core™ i9-12900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 30M, fino a 5,10 GHz
Buy for €364.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Intel BX80646I34150 Core i3-4150 Processore, 3M Cache, 3.50 GHz, FC-LGA12C, Boxed
Buy for €72.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
41.00039385584876%
Multi-Core
2047
14.737221022318215%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
